<질문>
Assume you as the director of Office of Science and Technology at White House. How can a country develop the strategy for golbal R&D cooperation? Describe in the following contents: importance, strength and weakness of USA, global trends, policy measures.
<답변>
As the Director of the Office of Science and Technology at the White House, I would recommend the following strategy for global R&D cooperation, based on the information provided in the document:
Importance:
Global R&D cooperation is crucial for the United States to maintain its leadership in science and technology, address pressing global challenges, and promote economic growth and national security. Collaboration with like-minded countries can help the US to access new markets, engage in collaborative research, and create new opportunities for innovation and entrepreneurship.
Strengths of the USA:
The United States has a strong track record of scientific and technological innovation, a robust research ecosystem, and a network of world-class research institutions. The US also has a long history of international collaboration, with many successful partnerships with allies and partners around the world.
Weaknesses of the USA:
The US faces increasing competition from other nations, particularly China, in the area of science and technology. China has made significant investments in research and development, and has implemented policies to attract top talent and acquire foreign technology. The US must therefore be proactive in maintaining its competitive edge and protecting its national security interests.
Global Trends:
The global landscape of science and technology is rapidly changing, with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and advanced manufacturing driving innovation and economic growth. There is also a growing recognition of the importance of research integrity and the need to protect research from political interference and exploitation.
Policy Measures:
To develop a successful strategy for global R&D cooperation, the US should consider the following policy measures:
1. Develop an International Science & Technology Strategy (ISTS): The US should develop a comprehensive strategy that outlines its priorities and goals for international science and technology cooperation. This strategy should be developed by a dedicated task force, led by the White House and involving all relevant government agencies and stakeholders.
2. Foster international dialogue around research protection and integrity: The US should work with like-minded allies and partners to promote research integrity and protect research from political interference and exploitation. This can be achieved through international agreements and partnerships, as well as through the development of standards and best practices for research ethics and integrity.
3. Enhance the US position as an international digital research hub: The US should continue to invest in its research infrastructure and digital capabilities, and work to establish itself as a leading hub for international research collaboration. This can be achieved through initiatives such as the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) International Science and Engineering Partnerships program.
4. Promote collaboration with allies and partners: The US should prioritize collaboration with like-minded countries in the development of new technologies and the solution of global challenges. This can be achieved through initiatives such as the Technology Competitiveness Council, which brings together government, industry, and academic leaders to promote US technological leadership.
5. Protect US research and intellectual property: The US should take steps to protect its research and intellectual property from exploitation and theft, particularly from countries such as China that have a history of such activities. This can be achieved through initiatives such as the National Security Presidential Memorandum on United States Government-Supported Research and Development National Security Policy.
In conclusion, the US should prioritize global R&D cooperation as a critical component of its national security and economic growth strategies. By developing a comprehensive International Science & Technology Strategy, fostering international dialogue around research protection and integrity, enhancing its position as an international digital research hub, promoting collaboration with allies and partners, and protecting US research and intellectual property, the US can maintain its leadership in science and technology and address the complex challenges of the 21st century.
Sources
Sources [Score | Link]:
- 0.89 | doc_security/Full-Report-Digital-1.pdf
- 0.89 | doc_security/DOE (2021) Critical Minerals and Materials Strategy_0.pdf
- 0.89 | doc_security/OSTP_history and overviewCRS2020.pdf
- 0.89 | doc_security/Full-Report-Digital-1.pdf
- 0.89 | doc_security/Full-Report-Digital-1.pdf
- 0.89 | doc_security/2018_NSTC_National_Strategic_Overview_QIS.pdf
- 0.89 | doc_security/Full-Report-Digital-1.pdf
- 0.89 | doc_security/Integrity and security in the global research ecosystem.pdf
- 0.89 | doc_security/CHIPS and Science Act.pdf
- 0.88 | doc_security/CHIPS and Science Act.pdf
international innovation and science coo
international innovation and science cooperation.30
Action for the Office of Science and Technology Policy:
• Foster international dialogue around research protection and integrity.
oThe Office of Science and Technology Policy, through the National Science and
Technology Council, should work in coordination with Department of State’s
Office of Science and Technology Cooperation and Office of the Science and
Technology Adviser to foster discussions with like-minded allies and partners
and cooperation between programs and off
and cooperation between programs and offices,
and with other agencies, will facilitate and increase
innovation from both existing work and future efforts.
An R&D strategy shaped by departmental coordination
and public-private partnerships enables the United
States to more efficiently address the underlying
scientific and early-stage applied research challenges,
and facilitates the validation and verification of new materials and processes in key technical areas across
89 National Science Board, International
89 National Science Board, International Science and Engineering Partnerships: A Priority for U.S. Foreign Policy and
Our Nation’s Innovation Enterprise , NSB 08 -4 (Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2008),
http://www.nsf.gov/ nsb/publications/ 2008/ nsb084.pdf . Jennifer Sue Bond, Mark Schaefer, David Rejeski, Rodney W.
Nichols, OSTP 2.0: Critical Upgrade: Enhancing Capacity for White House Science and Technology Policymaking:
foreign researchers’ involvement in join
foreign researchers’ involvement in joint projects. Sustained, strong collaboration
between the United States and allies and partners is critical to winning this techno-
competition and unleashing innovation and entrepreneurship across like-minded
countries. There is no substitute for shoulder-to-shoulder research for building
relationships, exchanging ideas and expertise, and sparking future collaboration.10
Reorient U.S. foreign policy and the Department of State for great power competition in
• Enhancing the United States’ position
• Enhancing the United States’ position as an international digital research hub.
Action for the President:
• Direct development of an International Science & Technology Strategy (ISTS) by a
White House-led interagency task force.
oThe President should direct development of the ISTS by a dedicated task force.
oThe ISTS Task Force should be convened by the Technology Competitiveness
Council or otherwise co-chaired by the Assistant to the President for National Chapter 15:
A Favorable International
Provide the key infrastructure and sup
Provide the key infrastructure and support needed to realize the scientific and technological
opportunities;
Drive economic growth;
Maintain national security; and
Continue to develop international collaboration and cooperation.
The key next step will be to develop agency-level plans that address the identified approaches and
policy opportunities in the next section, which will be integrated into an overall strategic plan. This will
TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION234 p““The United S
TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION234
p““The United States should strive
to build a coalition committed
to this principle and to research
integrity, sidelining those who
do not abide by the values that
underpin innovation and global
science cooperation.” Coordinate research protection efforts internationally with allies and partners. China’s
efforts to acquire foreign technology extend far beyond the United States.27 The Office of
Science and Technology Policy, the Department of State, and the Department of Justice
research institutions in a number of OEC
research institutions in a number of OECD countries. Respect from governments for the freedom and
autonomy of scientific research is an essential pre -condition for such cooperation to be effective.
The Presidential Memorandum on United States Government -Supported Research and Development
National Security Policy (The White House, 2021 [65]) requires the Director of the Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP), in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and heads of
licensing, that support the national sec
licensing, that support the national security strategy;
(B) develop or revise a national strategy to improve
the national competitiveness of United States science, tech-nology, research, and innovation to support the national security strategy; and
(C) submit to Congress—
(i) a report on the findings of the Director of the
Office of Science and Technology Policy with respect to the review conducted pursuant to subparagraph (A); and
Review. President.
Coordination. Consultation. Determination.
Consultation.
potential threats to the leadership of t
potential threats to the leadership of the United States in science and technology and opportunities for inter-national collaboration in science and technology; and
‘‘(E) plans to foster the development of international
partnerships to reinforce domestic policy actions, build new markets, engage in collaborative research, and create an Deadline. Coordination. Time period.
Input Tokens: 1235 | Output Tokens: 837
Total document chunks used: 10
End Sources
